“Los gerundios ‘analógicos’ en la historia del español”
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fecha de recepción: 1 de diciembre de 2012.Fecha de aceptación: 3 de octubre de 2013. El presente trabajo se centra en la documentación y en la distribución geográfica (histórica y actual) de los llamados gerundios ‘analógicos’ del español (tuviendo, quisiendo), sobre la base de los datos de varios corpus lingüísticos (CORDE, CREA, Corpus del español, ALPI y COSER). Revisamos las explicaciones analógicas previas sobre estas formas y establecemos una explicación sobre la extensión del tema de perfecto al gerundio, basada en el condicionamiento fonológico. También defendemos que la explicación fonológica está en relación con las nociones estables del cambio morfológico, desde la teoría de la morfología natural.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it