MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734419621 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0956

Distortion management of the Goos–Hänchen shifts in reflection–transmission beams

2017· article· en· W2734419621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Humayun Khan, Muhammad Haneef

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsOpticsReflection (computer programming)Distortion (music)Transmission (telecommunications)Beam (structure)Total internal reflectionAbsorption (acoustics)Light beamOptoelectronicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new scheme focusing on modification and control of distortion in the reflection and transmission of Goos–Hänchen (GH) shifted beams, is discussed. The absorptivity, reflectivity, and transmissivity are measured for the new atomic scheme. The GH-shifted beam is modified by control fields and incident angle. The sum of absorption, transmission, and reflection coefficients is equal to one. For positive reflection GH-shift region, there is negative transmission GH shift. The distortion in the reflected and transmitted beam is controlled with incident angle and control fields. The results discussed in this article show significant applications in micro-optics and nano-optics, acoustics, and plasma physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum optics and atomic interactionsFrench-language works237,207