MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734508814 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00365

Accurate DFT-D3 Calculations in a Small Basis Set

2017· article· en· W2734508814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAkademie Věd České RepublikyGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsBasis (linear algebra)Basis setSuperposition principleSet (abstract data type)Dispersion (optics)Computer scienceStatistical physicsAlgorithmPhysicsComputational chemistryMathematicsDensity functional theoryQuantum mechanicsChemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calculations of interaction energies of noncovalent interactions in small basis sets are affected by the basis set superposition error and dispersion-corrected DFT-D methods and are thus usually parametrized only for triple-ζ and larger basis sets. Nevertheless, some smaller basis sets could also perform well. Among many combinations tested, we obtained excellent results with the DZVP-DFT basis and newly parametrized D3 dispersion correction. The accuracy of interaction energies and geometries is close to significantly more expensive calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it