Seasonal and decadal variability of dust observations in the Kangerlussuaq area, west Greenland
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dust emissions from high-latitude, cold climate environments have started receiving\nmore attention in the past decade. This is because emission frequency and\nmagnitudes are expected to increase with rising global temperatures leading to a\nreduction in terrestrial ice masses and increases in suitable sediment for the aeolian\nsystem. Of the identified high-latitude dust source regions, Greenland has received\nrelatively little attention. Using World Meteorological Organization (WMO) dust code\nanalysis, this study presents a 70-year record of dust events and preferential dust\ntransport pathways from Kangerlussuaq, west Greenland. A clear seasonal pattern of\ndust emissions shows increases in dust events in spring and autumn driven by\neffective winds and sediment supply. The decadal record suggests an increase in the\nmagnitude, but not frequency, of dust events since the early 1990s. Pathways\nanalysis suggests that dust is preferentially transported away from the Greenland Ice\nSheet (GrIS) towards the Davis Strait and Labrador Sea. When dust is transported\ntowards the GrIS, it is more likely to be deposited in the ice-marginal ablation zone\nthan on the higher altitude areas of the ice sheet. The impact of dust deposition on\nterrestrial, cryospheric and aquatic environments is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it