MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734628372 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2725449

Truthful Mechanisms for Message Dissemination via Device-to-Device Communications

2017· article· en· W2734628372 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiming Zhao, Wei Song

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Device-to-device (D2D) communications are not only featured by high spectral and energy efficiency, but also offer appealing benefits for applications, such as message dissemination, traffic offloading, and coverage expansion. In this paper, we consider a message dissemination scenario where a base station (BS) can direct message requests to be fulfilled by some source devices via D2D communications and thereby save the resource cost. Furthermore, a source device may be subject to a cost budget due to its limited resources. To minimize the overall cost or maximize the BS's cost saving from offloading, it is essential to properly assign the message request(s) for each source and decide the payment to incentivize participation. The request direction is an NP-hard problem, while the payment determination is also nontrivial. The payment should be sufficient to compensate for a source device's resource cost, and meanwhile, incentivize the source to truthfully declare its private cost and budget. Modeling the problem as a reverse auction, we develop both a deterministic mechanism and a randomized mechanism, which are truthful or truthful in expectation, respectively. Both mechanisms are individually rational and subject to a computational complexity lower than that of the well-known Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism or its generalized version. While the deterministic mechanism performs well in an average sense, the randomized mechanism maintains an approximation guarantee for the worst case. Extensive numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanisms with various settings in the D2D content distribution scenario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207