MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734671737 · doi:10.5038/2074-1235.33.2.655

At-sea Distribution, Abundance, and Habitat Affinities of Xantus's Murrelets

2005· article· en· W2734671737 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Nina J. Karnovsky, Larry B. Spear, H R Carter, David G. Ainley, K D Amey, Lisa T. Ballance, K. T. Briggs, R. Glenn Ford, George L. Hunt, C. Keiper, John Mason, Kengathevy Morgan, RL Pitman, Cynthia T. Tynan

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine ornithology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWestern Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological SurveyFisheries and Oceans CanadaCalifornia Department of Fish and GameNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSimon Fraser UniversityU.S. Geological SurveyMassachusetts Department of Fish and GameNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSeabirdGeographyHabitatOrnithologyOceanographySubspeciesAbundance (ecology)PopulationFisheryGeologyEcologySouthern HemispherePredationBiologyPaleontologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We used shipboard and aerial surveys at sea to study distribution, abundance and habitat affinities of Xantus's Murrelets Synthliboramphus hypoleucus within their range, including waters from British Columbia to southern Baja California, and to 500 km offshore.We recorded 1628 murrelets during strip-transects conducted in most years from 1975 to 2003.Densities were highest over the continental slope (depths 200-1000 m) at distances 25-150 km offshore.Murrelets were most numerous in warmer waters of lower salinity, a pattern consistent each year regardless of El Niño-Southern Oscillation or Pacific Decadal Oscillation anomaly fluctuations.During the breeding season, murrelets concentrated in the Southern California Bight (SCB), with lower densities off Baja California and from Point Conception to Bodega Bay, California.During the nonbreeding period, they dispersed north as far as northern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, although densities were highest from central Baja California to central Oregon.We used generalized additive models to estimate the abundance of this species at sea.We observed no trends in abundances across years, 1975-2001 (SCB), and 1985-2003 (central California).After adjustment for biases in survey data, our estimate for the total number of Xantus's Murrelets in North America during the nonbreeding season is 39 700 birds, consisting of an estimated 17 900 breeding birds (95% confidence interval = 13 900 to 21 000) and 21 800 subadults/nonbreeders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine ornithologySame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207