MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Secrecy analysis for forward link multi-user massive MIMO system with MRT precoding

2015· article· en· W2734691861 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Chen, Chunsheng Zhu, Wei Chen, Kun Wang, Jibo Wei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingMIMOComputer scienceTransmitter power outputTopology (electrical circuits)Upper and lower boundsBase stationComputer networkAntenna (radio)SecrecyTransmission (telecommunications)Limit (mathematics)TelecommunicationsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)Computer securityTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The secrecy performance of forward link multi-user massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system is investigated in this paper. The base station (BS) equipped with a large number of transmit antennas sends mutually independent datas to multiple single-antenna legitimate users simultaneously. A passive multi-antenna eavesdropper is placed in the scenario to intercept the signals. We consider the case that the number of legitimate users and eavesdropper antennas increases proportionally with the number of BS antennas. Maximum ratio transmission (MRT) is used as linear precoder at the BS. Lower bounds on the ergodic achievable rate of legitimate users and upper bounds of the eavesdropper are derived. By minimizing the upper bounds on the achievable rates of the eavesdropper while satisfying the rate constraints of legitimate users, we present the corresponding optimal radiated power scaling (RPS) factor. In the limit of an infinite number of BS antennas, we prove that the optimal RPS factor converge to a different constant limit with that of the case in which the number of legitimate users and eavesdropper antennas is finite. We show that when the number of BS antennas grows large, the secrecy performance is mainly determined by the ratios between the number of BS antennas, legitimate users and eavesdropper antennas. A number of simulation results are presented to visualize the analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207