MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734787008 · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963002

Fully dynamical representation of a LFP battery cell

2017· article· en· W2734787008 on OpenAlexaff
Sepideh Afshar, Kirsten Morris, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgebraic equationNonlinear systemEstimatorState of chargeRepresentation (politics)State (computer science)Computer scienceApplied mathematicsBattery (electricity)Differential algebraic equationDifferential equationDynamical systems theoryMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium ion batteries are used to store energy in electric vehicles. The lithium ion cell's representing equations are partial differential equations coupled to algebraic equations. In general the state of this type of systems needs to be estimated using a limited number of measurements. State estimation is an important tool for reconstructing the state from available measurements and is employed to estimate the state of charge in batteries. Construction of an estimator is complicated not only by the distributed nature of the dynamics, but also by nonlinearity and also the difficulty of solving differential-algebraic systems of equations. However, the equations can be modified to facilitate the use of online filtering. The resulting equations can be shown to be well-posed and computationally tractable. Simulation results show satisfactory results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207