MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734816122 · doi:10.3917/jepam.126.0008

Daring to be simple: Lessons learned from the Kwid, Renault-Nissan’s Indian car

2017· article· fr· W2734816122 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Detourbet, Christophe Midler, Yves Doz

Bibliographic record

VenueLe journal de l école de Paris du management · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse multidisciplinary academic research
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Devant être conçue et fabriquée en Inde pour concurrencer les modèles les moins chers du marché, la Kwid impliquait de tout réinventer. La simplicité a été recherchée dans les moindres détails, même en dépit des standards. Pour imposer des choix iconoclastes aux maisons mères, il fallait un directeur de projet charismatique et une organisation réactive. Cette histoire dessine une stratégie pour des entreprises globales : partir des exigences de frugalité des marchés émergents pour inventer des solutions qui se propagent ensuite dans le monde. @@Pour concevoir et fabriquer la Kwid en Inde et ainsi concurrencer les modèles les moins chers de ce marché, il fallait tout réinventer. Imposer des choix iconoclastes aux maisons mères demandait un directeur de projet charismatique et une organisation réactive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe journal de l école de Paris du managementSame topicDiverse multidisciplinary academic researchFrench-language works237,207