MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734901550

How Islamic Finance Mitigate Financial Crises

2017· article· en· W2734901550 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mousa Al Manaseer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUsuryFinancial crisisMarket liquidityIslamEconomicsFinanceFinancial systemStructured financeBondMoney marketBusinessCapitalismInterest ratePoliticsPolitical scienceKeynesian economics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The worldwide monetary crisis that occurred in 2007 is the most exceedingly awful monetary emergency since the Great Depression in 1929. Manifestations of the crisis have begun through the tight liquidity in the banking system in the United States and the collapse of large financial institutions and falling stock and bond prices in addition to the failure of many of the major business companies. After that, the impacts of the monetary crisis spread to Europe and other countries. The effect of this crisis transferred quickly from the money related segment to the production sectors. This can be considered as a failure of the ideology of capitalism which concentrates on the interest-based finance. Since the beginning of the worldwide money related crisis, many of the studies and reports show that Islamic fund have not been adversely worldwide budgetary emergency, similar to the case in regular back, particularly in the principal time frame when the crisis emerged. The reason for this, according to these studies and reports that Islamic finance did not use interest (usury) and this is what gives it an advantage over the traditional finance, as Islamic fund concentrate on trading the origins of the material and this is what makes them immune toward the impacts of the worldwide money related crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207