MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2734944829

Delineation of the Molecular and Genetic Role of Teneurin C-terminal Associated Peptide-1 (TCAP-1) in Cytoskeletal Development and Neuroprotection Against Stress

2014· dissertation· en· W2734944829 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Louise de Lannoy

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroprotectionFilopodiaCytoskeletonBiologyCell biologyPeptideActinGeneticsNeuroscienceBiochemistryCell
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Corticotropin Releasing Factor (CRF) peptides are an evolutionarily conserved peptide family integral to the stress response. In 2002, an investigation was undertaken into possible homologues of CRF, which led to the discovery of the Teneurin C-terminal Associated Peptide (TCAP) family located on the C-terminal end of the teneurin proteins. This peptide family is involved in neuroprotection against stress. TCAP possesses a number of biological actions independent of teneurin, however, evidence of how TCAP is processed from its proprotein had not been determined. I hypothesize that TCAP is transcribed independently and has independent functionality in promoting filopodia elongation and outgrowth. Here, I show that TCAP-1 is independently expressed as an mRNA separate from the teneurin gene. Moreover, a key step in the TCAP-1 mediated molecular mechanism of filopodia outgrowth may require an interaction between Elongation Factor-1α (EF-1α) and the actin cytoskeleton, where this mechanism is not modulated by CRF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.001
GPT teacher head0.138
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→