FUCHS, Karin, Zeichen und Wunder bei Guibert de Nogent. Kommunikation, Deutungen und Funktionalisierung von Wundererzählungen im 12. Jahrhundert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
K.F. publie ici la thèse qu’elle a préparée sous la direction de Reinhold Kaiser et Peter Stotz à l’Université de Zurich – et soutenue au début de l’année 2004 – sur la signification des miracles dans l’œuvre de Guibert de Nogent († v. 1124). Ce travail vient à point nommé après la publication des actes du colloque de Weingarten (2002) sur le miracle au Moyen Âge et de la thèse d’Uta Kleine (2007) sur les recueils de miracles rhénans des XIe-XIIIe s. (voir Bull. MHFA, 40, 2004, p. 364-366 et ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".