Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let [Formula: see text] be a ring with 1. Given elements [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] and the integer [Formula: see text] define [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. We say that a given antiautomorphism [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is commuting if [Formula: see text], all [Formula: see text]. More generally, assume that [Formula: see text] satisfies the condition [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] are corresponding positive integers depending on [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] ranges over [Formula: see text]. To what extent can one say that [Formula: see text] is commuting? In this paper, we answer the question in the affirmative if R is a prime ring containing some idempotent element [Formula: see text]. In the diametrically opposed case in which [Formula: see text] is a division ring the answer is again yes provided [Formula: see text] is algebraic over its center and [Formula: see text] is of finite order. These two major complementary results will be put to work to provide an answer to the general question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it