MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735199399 · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963217

Optimal control of a distributed solar collector field

2017· article· en· W2735199399 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Xu, Yuan Yuan, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemOptimal controlPartial differential equationTrajectoryWork (physics)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceHyperbolic partial differential equationField (mathematics)Tracking (education)Optimization problemDistributed parameter systemMathematicsControl (management)EngineeringMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of a distributed solar collector field can be modelled by a nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equation (PDE) based on the energy balance. The model-based optimal control of the outlet temperature is studied. One of few ways to influence the outlet temperature is by adjusting the oil pump volumetric flow rate. In this work, an optimal algorithm is developed to minimize the mismatch between the outlet temperature and a desired temperature. The method is based on the adjoint approach for constrained optimization problems with a nonlinear hyperbolic PDE applied as an optimization constraint. In particular, the algorithm simplifies a problem by decomposing it into a two-level optimization problem. Unlike the traditional tracking control such as motion planing, the reference tracking equations in this work do not need state trajectory generation. Finally, the proposed approach is verified to perform well via a computer simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207