MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735441092 · doi:10.3917/rdm.049.0388

Don, potlatch et sacrifice. Formes graduées d’un même investissement sociétal

2017· article· fr· W2735441092 on OpenAlex
Richard Bucaille, Jeanne Virieux

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du MAUSS · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSacrificeHumanitiesArtPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En se fondant sur l’ample théorie maussienne du don (mais on préfère ici le terme « échange ») et sur quelques propositions d’Alain Caillé et Thomas Lindemann, on soutient que le don quelconque, le potlatch agonistique et le sacrifice de la vie sont trois variantes, en ordre croissant, d’un même engagement global des sociétaires, qui en attendent logiquement un retour. À cette aune, le potlatch apparaît comme une forme profane du sacrifice, et ce sacrifice un garant transcendantal du potlatch. On cherche à illustrer ces propositions en lisant la Grande Guerre comme un gigantesque potlatch, ce qui appelle un parallèle entre cérémonie commémorative du 11 Novembre et messe catholique : le poilu tué devenant un nouveau Christ, laïque mais non moins sacré.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it