Three-dimensional numerical investigation of flow through screens as energy dissipators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Screens, perforated units to dissipate energy in hydraulic structures, are investigated numerically in this study. These units are part of a physical setup exposed to supercritical flows, normally created by sluice gates. The interaction of perforated screens and supercritical flows results in local complex three-dimensional flows, which can be analyzed by the application of RANS-based flow equations. The most important controlling parameters include supercritical Froude number between 2 and 10 and screen porosity of 40% and 50%. Numerical water surface profiles and energy dissipation are validated by the author’s experimental data. This paper derives a set of equations in terms of depth ratio of the hydraulic jump through the perforated screens and assesses the effect of baffles on energy dissipation. This study seeks a proof-of-concept for the application of the RANS-based technique for further application of the result to real hydraulic structures in due course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it