MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735521671 · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2017.203

MultiPub: Latency and Cost-Aware Global-Scale Cloud Publish/Subscribe

2017· article· en· W2735521671 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Gascon‐Samson, Jörg Kienzle, Bettina Kemme

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingLatency (audio)PublicationScale (ratio)Distributed computingComputer networkOperating systemTelecommunicationsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topic-based pub/sub is a widely used communication mechanism in distributed systems for targeted information dissemination between loosely coupled entities. To scale dynamically depending on the current communication demands, pub/services can be conveniently deployed in the cloud. To provide fast dissemination, the service can be distributed across multiple cloud regions. The architectural design and run-time deployment of such a middleware is tricky, though, as it can have a significant effect on communication latency and cloud-based cost. In this paper, we propose MultiPub, a flexible pub/sub middleware for latency-constrained, world-wide distributed applications that dynamically reconfigures the communication layer to ensure a predefined maximum latency for publication dissemination while minimizing cloud-based costs. This is achieved by routing publications either through a single or across multiple cloud regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of MultiPub by presenting a set of experiments that report on the achieved communication latency and cost savings compared to traditional approaches, as well as a performance evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207