MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Big GABA: Edited MR spectroscopy at 24 research sites

2017· article· en· W2735522416 on OpenAlexaff
Mark E. Mikkelsen, Peter B. Barker, Pallab Bhattacharyya, Maiken K. Brix, Pieter F. Buur, Kim M. Cecil, Kimberly L. Chan, David Y.T. Chen, Alexander R. Craven, Koen Cuypers, Michael Dacko, Niall W. Duncan, Ulrike Dydak, David A. Edmondson, Gabriele Ende, Lars Ersland, Fei Gao, Ian Greenhouse, Ashley D. Harris, Naying He, Stefanie Heba, Nigel Hoggard, Tun‐Wei Hsu, Jacobus F.A. Jansen, Alayar Kangarlu, Thomas Lange, R. Marc Lebel, Yan Li, Chien‐Yuan Lin, Jy-Kang Liou, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Feng Liu, Ruoyun Ma, Celine Maes, Marta Moreno-Ortega, Scott O. Murray, Sean Noah, Ralph Noeske, Michael D. Noseworthy, Georg Oeltzschner, James J. Prisciandaro, Nicolaas A.J. Puts, Timothy P. L. Roberts, Markus Sack, Napapon Sailasuta, Muhammad G. Saleh, Michael‐Paul Schallmo, Nicholas Simard, Stephan P. Swinnen, Martin Tegenthoff, Peter Truong, Guangbin Wang, Iain D. Wilkinson, Hans-Jörg Wittsack, Hongmin Xu, Fuhua Yan, Chencheng Zhang, Vadim Zipunnikov, Helge J. Zöllner, Richard A.E. Edden

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoGeneral Electric (Canada)University of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Eye InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNational Institutes of HealthNational Natural Science Foundation of China
Keywordsgamma-Aminobutyric acidNeuroscienceVariance (accounting)Computer sciencePsychologyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations202
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207