Bibliographic record
Abstract
Books reviewed: Lynette Olson, ed., Religious Change, Conversion and Culture Tord Fornberg and David Hellholm, eds, Texts and Contexts: BiblicalTexts in Their Textual and Situational Contexts Judith Lieu, Image and Reality: The Jews in the World of theChristians in the Second Century Marjorie O’Rourke Boyle, Divine Domesticity: Augustine of Thagasteto Teresa of Avila W. David Myers, ‘Poor Sinning Folk’: Confession and Conscience in Counter‐Reformation Germany A. Lynn Martin, Plague? Jesuit Accounts of Epidemic Disease inthe 16th Century Francis Edwards, SJ, Robert Persons: The Biography of an ElizabethanJesuit, 1546‐1610 Peter Kaufman, Prayer, Despair, and Drama. ElizabethanIntrospection Nigel Aston, ed., Religious Change in Europe, 1650‐1914: Essaysfor John McManners Alan P. F. Sell, John Locke and the Eighteenth‐Century Divines B. W. Young: Religion and Enlightenment in Eighteenth‐Century England, Theological Debate from Locke to Burke Simon Ross Valentine, John Bennet and the Origins of Methodismand the Evangelical Revival in England Peter Nockles, The Oxford Movement in Context: Anglican HighChurchmanship, 1760‐1857 Susannah Heschel, Abraham Geiger and the Jewish Jesus Adrian Desmond, Huxley: Evolution’s High Priest M. Gauvreau and N. Christie, A Full‐Orbed Christianity: TheProtestant Churches and Social Welfare in Canada, 1900‐1940 M. R. MacGinley, A Dynamic of Hope: Institutes of Women Religiousin Australia Catherine Kovesi Killerby, Ursula Frayne: A biography Antony Copley, Religions in Conflict: Ideology, Cultural Contactand Conversion in Late‐Colonial India Donald S. Lopez, Jr., Religions of China in Practice
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.672 | 0.689 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".