MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735810668 · doi:10.1177/009145090202900308

Book: Review/Commentary: Sit down and Drink Your Beer: Regulating Vancouver's Beer Parlours, 1925–1954

2002· article· en· W2735810668 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alan C. Ogborne

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Drug Problems · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingMedicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sit Down and Drink Your Beer: Regulating Vancouver's Beer Parlours, 1925-1954, by Robert A. Campbell (Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 2001), 192 pp./20 illustrations, cloth Can$50; paper Can$19.95. Vancouver's beer parlors were opened following the repeal of a brief (four-year) war-related prohibition. They were, for many years, the only public drinking establishments accessible to ordinary working men (mainly) and women. Concerns that these parlors might come to resemble the discredited preprohibition saloons led to a variety of regulations that governed the behavior and attitudes of those who came in to drink. These regulations encompassed not only drinking and related behaviors but also the class, gender, sexuality, age, and even citizenship of patrons. Sit Down and Drink Your Beer, a scholarly yet accessible and often entertaining book, tells how these regulations were variously enforced by state inspectors and supported, ignored, or subverted by owners, operators and clients. More importantly, it shows how the regulatory process was not simply a top-down process whereby the state and elites sought to control working-class drinking, but a more complex and de-centered process involving various actors in discourses about notions of normality and decency. The book has seven chapters, including an introduction and outline. The first main chapter gives a brief account of prohibition and the pre-prohibition saloons that were so greatly reviled by prohibitionists. This chapter also outlines the origins of the beer parlors and the regulations that were supposed to ensure that they would not simply become saloons by another name. These regulations were enforced by a regulatory board and by inspectors who sometimes worked undercover. The police and public health officials were also much concerned about compliance, and the media delighted in tales of corruption and debauchery. However, the day-to-day responsibilities for ensuring compliance with the regulations rested with the operators and The second chapter focuses on the beer parlor operators and the beer parlor workers' union. It begins by drawing attention to the case of the retiring president of the hotels association being made an honorary member of the union, whose official goal was to stop the exploitation of the workers. This case supports the author's thesis that the regulation of alcohol involves complex relationships among different social classes. Although bounded by relationships grounded in class, workers, operators, union and employers were also linked by the demands of regulation and the need for profits and safe working environments. Chapter three, Ladies and Escorts, considers the regulation and negotiation of gender and sexuality. Initially women were excluded from the beer parlors, but later they were allowed in partitioned ladies-and-escort sections, and some bars became popular with lesbians. However, single women were often suspected of being prostitutes, and during World War II prostitutes working in bars were (erroneously) accused of making a significant contribution to the spread of venereal disease. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContemporary Drug ProblemsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207