MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735810668 · doi:10.1177/009145090202900308

Book: Review/Commentary: Sit down and Drink Your Beer: Regulating Vancouver's Beer Parlours, 1925–1954

2002· article· en· W2735810668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContemporary Drug Problems · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingMedicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sit Down and Drink Your Beer: Regulating Vancouver's Beer Parlours, 1925-1954, by Robert A. Campbell (Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 2001), 192 pp./20 illustrations, cloth Can$50; paper Can$19.95. Vancouver's beer parlors were opened following the repeal of a brief (four-year) war-related prohibition. They were, for many years, the only public drinking establishments accessible to ordinary working men (mainly) and women. Concerns that these parlors might come to resemble the discredited preprohibition saloons led to a variety of regulations that governed the behavior and attitudes of those who came in to drink. These regulations encompassed not only drinking and related behaviors but also the class, gender, sexuality, age, and even citizenship of patrons. Sit Down and Drink Your Beer, a scholarly yet accessible and often entertaining book, tells how these regulations were variously enforced by state inspectors and supported, ignored, or subverted by owners, operators and clients. More importantly, it shows how the regulatory process was not simply a top-down process whereby the state and elites sought to control working-class drinking, but a more complex and de-centered process involving various actors in discourses about notions of normality and decency. The book has seven chapters, including an introduction and outline. The first main chapter gives a brief account of prohibition and the pre-prohibition saloons that were so greatly reviled by prohibitionists. This chapter also outlines the origins of the beer parlors and the regulations that were supposed to ensure that they would not simply become saloons by another name. These regulations were enforced by a regulatory board and by inspectors who sometimes worked undercover. The police and public health officials were also much concerned about compliance, and the media delighted in tales of corruption and debauchery. However, the day-to-day responsibilities for ensuring compliance with the regulations rested with the operators and The second chapter focuses on the beer parlor operators and the beer parlor workers' union. It begins by drawing attention to the case of the retiring president of the hotels association being made an honorary member of the union, whose official goal was to stop the exploitation of the workers. This case supports the author's thesis that the regulation of alcohol involves complex relationships among different social classes. Although bounded by relationships grounded in class, workers, operators, union and employers were also linked by the demands of regulation and the need for profits and safe working environments. Chapter three, Ladies and Escorts, considers the regulation and negotiation of gender and sexuality. Initially women were excluded from the beer parlors, but later they were allowed in partitioned ladies-and-escort sections, and some bars became popular with lesbians. However, single women were often suspected of being prostitutes, and during World War II prostitutes working in bars were (erroneously) accused of making a significant contribution to the spread of venereal disease. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it