MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2735810668 · doi:10.1177/009145090202900308

Book: Review/Commentary: Sit down and Drink Your Beer: Regulating Vancouver's Beer Parlours, 1925–1954

2002· article· en· W2735810668 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueContemporary Drug Problems · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAdvertisingMedicineBusiness

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sit Down and Drink Your Beer: Regulating Vancouver's Beer Parlours, 1925-1954, by Robert A. Campbell (Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 2001), 192 pp./20 illustrations, cloth Can$50; paper Can$19.95. Vancouver's beer parlors were opened following the repeal of a brief (four-year) war-related prohibition. They were, for many years, the only public drinking establishments accessible to ordinary working men (mainly) and women. Concerns that these parlors might come to resemble the discredited preprohibition saloons led to a variety of regulations that governed the behavior and attitudes of those who came in to drink. These regulations encompassed not only drinking and related behaviors but also the class, gender, sexuality, age, and even citizenship of patrons. Sit Down and Drink Your Beer, a scholarly yet accessible and often entertaining book, tells how these regulations were variously enforced by state inspectors and supported, ignored, or subverted by owners, operators and clients. More importantly, it shows how the regulatory process was not simply a top-down process whereby the state and elites sought to control working-class drinking, but a more complex and de-centered process involving various actors in discourses about notions of normality and decency. The book has seven chapters, including an introduction and outline. The first main chapter gives a brief account of prohibition and the pre-prohibition saloons that were so greatly reviled by prohibitionists. This chapter also outlines the origins of the beer parlors and the regulations that were supposed to ensure that they would not simply become saloons by another name. These regulations were enforced by a regulatory board and by inspectors who sometimes worked undercover. The police and public health officials were also much concerned about compliance, and the media delighted in tales of corruption and debauchery. However, the day-to-day responsibilities for ensuring compliance with the regulations rested with the operators and The second chapter focuses on the beer parlor operators and the beer parlor workers' union. It begins by drawing attention to the case of the retiring president of the hotels association being made an honorary member of the union, whose official goal was to stop the exploitation of the workers. This case supports the author's thesis that the regulation of alcohol involves complex relationships among different social classes. Although bounded by relationships grounded in class, workers, operators, union and employers were also linked by the demands of regulation and the need for profits and safe working environments. Chapter three, Ladies and Escorts, considers the regulation and negotiation of gender and sexuality. Initially women were excluded from the beer parlors, but later they were allowed in partitioned ladies-and-escort sections, and some bars became popular with lesbians. However, single women were often suspected of being prostitutes, and during World War II prostitutes working in bars were (erroneously) accused of making a significant contribution to the spread of venereal disease. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,660
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle