Evaluating the Impact of Promotion Price, Product Quality, Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Repeating Purchase Incentives (Case Study: Amiran Chain Stores)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of price promotion on evaluating the quality of customer and repeating purchase incentives. This research is an applied study in terms of objective, it is also considered as a causal study. Field study and questionnaire were used to evaluate hypotheses and statistical analysis of data. The population of this research includes customers of Amiran chain stores in Karaj. Finally 300 questionnaires have been completed using appropriate sampling. To test the hypotheses, structural equation modeling and LISREL software were used. According to the analysis of data, the results indicate that the price promotion affects on the product quality, service quality, satisfaction and repeating purchase incentives in Amiran chain stores in Karaj. The product quality and service quality significantly affect satisfaction of customers in Amiran chain stores in Karaj; and satisfaction has a significant effect on repeating purchase incentives in Amiran chain stores in Karaj.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".