MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2735906249 · doi:10.7202/1040195ar

Unmanned : la représentation de la mort à l’époque des drones

2017· article· fr· W2735906249 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Amélie Paquet

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le jeu vidéo indépendant Unmanned (2012) de Jim Munroe raconte la crise de l’éthos guerrier causée par l’arrivée des drones comme stratégie privilégiée par l’armée américaine. Le personnage, contrôlé par le joueur, évolue dans un monde où il lui faut sans cesse agir de manière contradictoire. Pour cette raison, il doit tenter de réconcilier sa vie personnelle et sa vie professionnelle. Unmanned montre les troubles causés par cette nouvelle manière de tuer les ennemis. Le mort échappe désormais au domaine de la représentation. L’étude de cette oeuvre vidéoludique permet aussi de voir comment l’espace créatif du jeu indépendant permet de construire un commentaire critique sur l’industrie du jeu vidéo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontières→Same topicDigital Games and Media→French-language works237,207→