MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736016368

A fistful of fingers : global farming

2016· article· en· W2736016368 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Koos Coetzee

Bibliographic record

VenueFarmers' Weekly · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurrencyLiberian dollarEconomicsValue (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Competition (biology)Monetary economicsUs dollarU.S. Dollar IndexStore of valueInternational economicsFinancial economicsGeographyFinanceStatisticsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 11 January, the rand reached an all-time low of R16,88 to the US dollar. At the time of writing, the value had improved slightly to between R14,50 and R15,50. Economists are divided on the future value of the rand. The group that takes part in the Economist of the Year competition estimates a value of between R13,95 and R20 to the dollar for the last quarter of 2016, with a consensus estimate of R15,90. If you ignore the extreme spikes caused by global crises, the long-term trend shows that the rand devalues by about 8% per year. Why is the rand weak? The price of a currency is determined by supply and demand. As the price is expressed in terms of another currency, the supply and demand of that other currency also influences the price.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFarmers' WeeklySame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207