MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736038898 · doi:10.25518/0037-9565.7064

Données nouvelles sur quelques espèces minérales de Haut-le-Wastia

2017· article· fr· W2736038898 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Blondieau, Stéphane Puccio, Philippe Compère, Frédéric Hatert

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorapatiteHumanitiesChemistryArtMineralogyApatite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La béraunite, la fluorapatite et le xénotime-(Y) sont trois espèces nouvelles observées dans l'indice phosphaté de Haut-le-Wastia dont la minéralogie avait été initialement décrite en 1985 par R. Van Tassel. La présence de xénotime-(Y) en inclusion dans la fluorapatite et contenant un peu d'uranium, est une donnée nouvelle à considérer pour rendre compte de la radioactivité observée dans les couches de passage Viséen-Namurien du bassin de Dinant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.054
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de LiègeSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207