Enquête sur les entreprises touchées par le système de plafonnement et d'échange de droits d'émission de gaz à effet de serre au Québec (SPEDE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les entreprises touchées par le marché du carbone québécois sont-elles favorables à celui-ci ? Quelles sont leurs préoccupations ? Quelles préférences ont-elles quant à l’utilisation des revenus du Fonds vert ? Voilà le type de questions auxquelles répond une enquête dont les résultats sont publiés aujourd’hui dans un rapport Bourgogne CIRANO-IEDDEC, Enquête sur les entreprises touchées par le Système de plafonnement et d’échange de droits d’émission de gaz à effet de serre du Québec, rédigé par Erick Lachapelle, Jacques Papy, Pierre-Olivier Pineau et Hélène Trudeau. Comprendre ce portrait est d’autant plus important aujourd’hui que la Californie a proposé une refonte majeure pour son marché, après 2020, qui pourrait venir ébranler le marché québécois et compliquer l’atteinte des cibles de réductions de gaz à effet de serre (GES) du Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".