MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736153531 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2017.2774706

A Fixed-Scale Pixelated MIMO Visible Light Communication System

2017· article· en· W2736153531 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMIMOTransmitterVisible light communicationChannel (broadcasting)Optical wirelessCommunications systemElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pixelated MIMO wireless optical communication system is introduced, which transmits a series of time-varying coded images that can be received and decoded by commercial digital cameras. The system exploits the bokeh effect to obtain fixed-scale images at all link distances by placing a convex lens in front of the transmitter array at its focal length and focusing the receiver at infinity. This spatial-angular mapping simplifies the receiver structure requiring no re-focusing as the receiver moves. As an additional benefit, this mapping can also be exploited to provide location information to the receiver. The channel model is measured and modeled and rateless codes are applied to track the truncation of receive images for various link ranges and angular offsets. A proof-of-concept optical communication system is implemented with an LCD display and a high-speed CMOS camera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it