MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736155473 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180654

RNAi-based reverse genetics in the chelicerate model Tetranychus urticae: A comparative analysis of five methods for gene silencing

2017· article· en· W2736155473 on OpenAlexafffund
Takeshi Suzuki, Maria Andréia Nunes, María Urizarna España, Hooman Hosseinzadeh Namin, Peng‐Yu Jin, Nicolas Bensoussan, Vladimir Zhurov, Tawhid Rahman, Rebecca De Clercq, Pierre Hilson, Vojislava Grbić, Miodrag Grbić

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoSeoul National UniversityGovernment of Canada
KeywordsRNA interferenceRNA silencingBiologyTetranychus urticaeSpider miteGene silencingCaenorhabditis elegansGenetically modified cropsGeneticsTransgeneMiteGeneBotanyRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RNA interference (RNAi) can be used for the protection against agricultural pests through the silencing of genes required for pest fitness. To assess the potential of RNAi approaches in the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, we compared 5 methods for the delivery of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). These methods include mite feeding on either (i) leaves floating on a dsRNA solution, (ii) dsRNA-expressing plants, (iii) artificial diet supplemented with dsRNA, or (iv) dsRNA-coated leaves, and (v) mite soaking in a dsRNA solution. In all cases, the gene targeted for method validation was the Vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (TuVATPase), encoding a constitutively expressed ATP-driven proton pump located in the membrane. Down-regulation of TuVATPase increased mortality and/or reduced fecundity in all methods, but with variable efficiency. The most efficient methods for dsRNA delivery were direct soaking of mites in the dsRNA solution and mite feeding on dsRNA-coated leaves that mimics dsRNA application as a sprayable pesticide. Both resulted in a dark-body phenotype not observed in mites treated with a control dsRNA. Although with lower efficiency, dsRNA designed for TuVATPase silencing and expressed in transgenic Arabidopsis plants impacted the fitness of mites feeding on these plants. RNAi may thus be a valuable strategy to control spider mite populations, either as a sprayable pesticide or through transgenic crops. This comparative methodological study focusing on the induction of RNAi-based gene silencing in T. urticae paves the way for reverse genetics approaches in this model chelicerate system and prepares large-scale systematic RNAi screens as a first step towards the development of specific RNA-based pesticides. Such alternative molecules may help control spider mites that cause significant damages to crops and ornamental plant species, as well as other chelicerates detrimental to agriculture and health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207