DECAPITACIÓN Y CABEZAS HUMANAS DEL VALLE DE ACARÍ, PERÚ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Las excavaciones arqueológicas efectuadas en Amato, un sitio establecido a inicios del periodo Intermedio Temprano (circa 50 a.C – 300 d.C) en el valle de Acarí de la costa sur del Perú, permitió recuperar dos cabezas humanas en dos contextos diferentes. El primero proviene de las inmediaciones de decenas de esqueletos humanos decapitados, mientras que el segundo fue expuesto asociado al muro perimétrico que fortifica al sitio. Ambas cabezas recibieron un tratamiento similar a las cabezas trofeo; sin embargo, éstas no tienen el orificio en el hueso frontal, como tampoco presentan el foramen magnum alterado, características propias de las cabezas trofeo. Estos dos hallazgos demuestran que por lo menos en el valle de Acarí, la decapitación humana no fue efectuada exclusivamente para obtener cabezas trofeo. Esto implica además, que la decapitación y la toma de las cabezas fueron efectuadas por diversas razones y para cumplir funciones distintas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".