Ligand recognition and helical stacking formation are intimately linked in the SAM-I riboswitch regulatory mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riboswitches are noncoding mRNA elements that control gene expression by altering their structure upon metabolite binding. Although riboswitch crystal structures provide detailed information about RNA–ligand interactions, little knowledge has been gathered to understand how riboswitches modulate gene expression. Here, we study the molecular recognition mechanism of the S -adenosylmethionine SAM-I riboswitch by characterizing the formation of a helical stacking interaction involving the ligand-binding process. We show that ligand binding is intimately linked to the formation of the helical stacking, which is dependent on the presence of three conserved purine residues that are flanked by stacked helices. We also find that these residues are important for the formation of a crucial long-range base pair formed upon SAM binding. Together, our results lend strong support to a critical role for helical stacking in the folding pathway and suggest a particularly important function in the formation of the long-range base pair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".