Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a hybrid ARIMA-GARCH model is proposed to model and predict the equity returns for three US benchmark indices: Dow Transportation, S&P 500 and VIX. Equity returns are univariate time series data sets, one of the methods to predict them is using the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models. Despite the fact that the ARIMA models are powerful and flexible, they are not be able to handle the volatility and nonlinearity that are present in the time series data. However, the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models are designed to capture volatility clustering behavior in time series. In this paper, we provide motivations and descriptions of the hybrid ARIMA-GARCH model. A complete data analysis procedure that involves a series of hypothesis testings and a model fitting procedure using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is provided in this paper as well. Simulation results of out of sample predictions are also provided in this paper as a reference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".