MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736318913 · doi:10.1109/twc.2017.2730185

Joint Hybrid Tx–Rx Design for Wireless Backhaul With Delay-Outage Constraint in Massive MIMO Systems

2017· article· en· W2736318913 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruikai Mai, Tho Le‐Ngoc, Duy H. N. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMIMOBasebandPrecodingComputer scienceBackhaul (telecommunications)Channel state informationMathematical optimizationWirelessTopology (electrical circuits)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmBeamformingMathematicsTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies joint design of mixed-timescale hybrid precoding and combining to maximize the effective capacity for wireless backhaul in massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. Specifically, radio frequency (RF) analog processing is adaptive to statistical channel state information (CSI) while digital baseband processing is updated with instantaneous effective CSI. Equipped with traditional MIMO solutions at the baseband, the issue of RF design for both unconstrained-modulus and constant-modulus elements is addressed. Under the jointly correlated channel model, the objective function does not have a closed-form expression. In the unconstrained case, we derive the optimal RF solution structures, which lead to a combinatorial eigenmode selection formulation. Such an NP-hard problem is solved to near-optimality by semi-definite relaxation. In view of the additional difficulty posed by the non-convex modulus constraint, we exploit the problem structure to construct the constant-modulus design from the unconstrained-modulus solution which is cast as a problem of joint matrix approximation and solved by low-complexity Jacobi-like algorithms. Numerical results show that under loose and stringent delay-outage constraints, the mixed-timescale hybrid designs deliver effective rates comparable with other perfect CSI-based state-of-the-art baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207