MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736395579

Église catholique et étudiants en professions de santé : enjeux pastoraux, théologiques et bioéthiques de leur rencontre au sein des Aumôneries universitaires et des Centres d’entraide aux études de médecine dirigés par des Jésuites

2009· dissertation· fr· W2736395579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J.-C. Otteni

Bibliographic record

VenueServeur des thèses de l'Université de Strasbourg (University of Strasbourg) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioethicsAttendanceQuarter (Canadian coin)TheologySociologyPolitical scienceHistoryLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Formal contacts between the Roman Catholic Church and students of healthcare, especially medical students, either in Catholic Fellowships in Universities (CFUs) under the auspices of chaplains, or in Centres for Mutual Support in Medical Studies run by Jesuits (CMSMSJs), as Laennec Centre in Paris, began in France during the last quarter of the XIXth century. The number of these contacts in CFUs reached a peak in the middle of the XXth century but thereafter suffered a steep decline. This was at a time when the number of medical students had actually increased. In contrast, attendance at CMSMSJs, which admit students irrespective of their religion, remained at a maximal level. This doctoral thesis is based on surveys of 31 CFUs and 3 CMSMSJs in which contacts currently take place. It examines the pastoral, theological and bioethical aspects of these contacts and considers how they might be facilitated. In the CFUs, obstacles to pastoral contact include a general decrease in religious observance and increasing pressures of time on medical students. In the CMSMSJs, attendance by students, whatever their religion, remains maximal owing to the excellent study support provided. However, the pastoral contact with Catholic students is confronted with similar difficulties. Pressure of time remains the main obstacle to discussions on the theology of healthcare (problems relating to sanctity of human life, illness, suffering and death). The same obstacle hinders participation by medical students in discussions justifying Roman Catholic bioethical principles and comparison of these principles with those of other religions. Despite these difficulties, almost impossible to overcome, it is recommended that contacts between these Roman Catholic bodies and medical students should be maintained as far as possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueServeur des thèses de l'Université de Strasbourg (University of Strasbourg)Same topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207