MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736423369 · doi:10.5539/jmbr.v7n1p112

Small Colony Variants and Triclosan Resistance in Five International Clones of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2017· article· en· W2736423369 on OpenAlex
Zainab Al-Doori, Donald A. Morrison, John Philpott‐Howard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Biology Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAntimicrobial agents and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriclosanMicrobiologyStaphylococcus aureusBiocideMinimum inhibitory concentrationMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusBiologyChemistryBacteriaMedicineAntimicrobialGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triclosan (2.4.4’ trichloro-2’-hydroxydiphenyl ether) is a broad-spectrum biocide which is also used to decolonise patients with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Microbial resistance to biocides has recently been reported, so it is important that new products should be tested for resistance that may arise from continued exposure to such agents. In a previous study 232 strains of MRSA isolated during 1997-2000 in 30 Scottish hospitals were tested for triclosan susceptibility; overall the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of triclosan for these strains ranged from <=0.015 to 4 mg/L. In the present study, resistance to triclosan was examined in five major international MRSA clones [Clonal Complex (CC22, CC30, CC45, CC8 and CC5)] by growing them in brain heart infusion broth in the presence of increasing concentrations of triclosan (0.03mg/L, 0.06 mg/L, 0.125 mg/L, 0.25 mg/L, and 0.5 mg/L ) for up to 67 days. Different MRSA clones showed different degrees of triclosan tolerance. CC22 (EMRSA–15), CC30 (EMRSA-16) and CC5 triclosan-tolerant derivatives showed a significant increase in triclosan MIC when compared to their parents, principally through the appearance of pinpoint-size small colony variants (SCV), as well as colonies of normal or small size. These MRSA SCVs emerged in different clones and at different times of exposure to triclosan. The triclosan MICs of mutants of all colony sizes rose to 4 mg/L in all clones except MRSA111-29 (CC45) which had an MIC 4-8 mg/L. Triclosan-resistant MRSA strains were also able to grow in the presence of higher triclosan concentrations: 1.25 mg/L (CC22), 10 mg/L (CC30), 25 mg/L (CC45), 5 mg/L (CC8) and 25 mg/L (CC5). In addition, six triclosan resistant derivatives from each MRSA clone, together with their parental clone, were examined by antibiogram, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping and detailed susceptibility to triclosan in terms of MIC and kill kinetics. Susceptibility to the aminoglycosides kanamycin, neomycin and tobramycin was decreased in four clones, and tetracycline susceptibility increased in one clone. PCR ribotyping confirmed clonally similar to the mutants. Kill kinetics of both parents and their triclosan resistant mutants showed 5-Logs reduction at 0.5 min and 5 min respectively in all five clones. In conclusion, repeated exposure of MRSA to triclosan may result in resistance to this biocide, and to clinically-relevant antimicrobials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it