MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736561736

Prairie spiders of Alberta and Saskatchewan

2002· article· en· W2736561736 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAUSpace (Athabasca University) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the prairie ecozone of Alberta and Saskatchewan,
\n356 species of spiders in 2 I families have been
\ncollected. The 10 families with the most species were
\nLinyphiidae (30%), Gnaphosidae (13%), Salticidae
\n(8%), Theridiidae (8%), Lycosidae (8%), Dictynidae
\n(6%), Thomisidae (6%), Araneidae (5%),
\nPhilodromidae (5%) and Clubionidae (3%). These 10
\nfamilies constituted 91% of the spider biodiversity. In
\nthe grassland region ofthe prairie ecozone, there were
\nrelatively more species of Gnaphosidae, Lycosidae,
\nTheridiidae, Thomisidae, Dictynidae and
\nPhilodomidae and fewer Linyphiidae and Clubionidae
\nthan for all provincial ecozones combined. The percentages
\nin the parkland region of the prairie ecozone
\ntended to be intermediate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it