Programas de entrenamiento neuromuscular para la prevención de lesiones en jóvenes deportistas. Revisión de la literatura.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Los objetivos de esta revisión son: (1) describir los principales programas de prevención de lesiones de la extremidad inferior en jóvenes deportistas que cuentan con una eficacia demostrada, cuya prevención ha estado dirigida a deportes colectivos de balón, no requieren de material adicional para su aplicación y la duración permite su implementación como calentamiento previo a la práctica deportiva; y (2) analizar las ventajas e inconvenientes de las medidas preventivas de acuerdo a su posibilidad de implantación de manera regular en el deporte. Para ello, un total de 5 programas neuromuscularespara la prevenciónde lesiones fueron seleccionados. Aunque todos los programas han demostradoefectos positivossobre la reducción de la incidencia lesional, el análisis pormenorizado de las características de las 5 medidas preventivas recomienda el uso de los programas FIFA 11+ y el Knäkontroll por su mayor adaptabilidad al contexto de aplicacióny la facilidad de su implementación de manera regular en el deporte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".