MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736609235 · doi:10.22215/sjcs.v5i1.289

"The Greatest Freedom Show on Earth": Emancipation Celebrations in Windsor, Ontario, 1957-1968

2012· article· en· W2736609235 on OpenAlexaffabout
Victoria Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueSouthern Journal of Canadian Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindsorEmancipationPoliticsSociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesLawHistoryPolitical economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between the mid-1930s and the mid-1960s, Emancipation Celebrations in Windsor, Ontario were referred to in the city as "The Greatest Freedom Show on Earth." This article explores debates between Emancipation organizers and Windsor city officials between 1957 and 1968 to demonstrate that distance from the era of slavery did not eradicate the contested nature of Emancipation celebrations as sites of political and social agitation, but resulted in new arguments about the position of African Canadians in the community. As Emancipation Day became increasingly associated with the Freedom Movement across the border, Windsor City Council and the Windsor Police Department began to push against the celebrations, eventually culminating to the celebration's cancellations in 1967 and 1968 in reaction to the Detroit Riot. The responses of Emancipation Day organizers and their supporters to this treatment will demonstrate how African Canadians in Windsor attempted to uncover city officials' claims to race neutrality and attempted to define themselves rather than be defined by others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0290.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouthern Journal of Canadian StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207