MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736644714 · doi:10.18178/ijcea.2016.7.6.610

Interactive Influence of Enzyme Loading and Initial Concentration of Fermentable Sugars on Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Cellulose to Ethanol

2016· article· en· W2736644714 on OpenAlexafffund
Jalil Shadbahr, Faisal Khan, Yan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemical Engineering and Applications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFermentationHydrolysisChemistryCelluloseEthanolEthanol fermentationFood scienceEnzymatic hydrolysisEnzymePulp and paper industryEthanol fuelChromatographyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enzyme loading and initial concentrations of fermentable sugars are the key parameters in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process to produce bioethanol. To study the interactive influence of enzyme loading and initial concentration of sugars on the final ethanol yield and concentration, batch SSF experiments were carried out at three enzyme loadings (10, 15 and 20 FPU/g cellulose) and two levels of initial concentrations of fermentable sugars (glucose and mannose). Results indicated that the maximum ethanol yield and concentration were obtained at high level of sugar concentration with intermediate enzyme loading (15 FPU/g cellulose). Increasing the enzyme loading from intermediate level (15 FPU/g cellulose) to high level (20 FPU/g cellulose) diminished the ethanol yield due to the inhibitory effect of the glucose and insufficient amount of yeast. Experimental results of SSF process also reveal that an efficient mixing between the phases helps to improve the ethanol yield significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Chemical Engineering and ApplicationsSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207