MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736735902 · doi:10.1115/1.4037324

Corrosion Behaviour of Bare and NiCrAlY Coated Alloy 214 in Supercritical Water at 700 °C

2017· article· en· W2736735902 on OpenAlexaffabout
Suzan Bsat, Xiao Huang, Sami Penttilä

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSubcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupercritical fluidMaterials scienceSpinelCorrosionCoolantOxideAlloyMetallurgyHigh-temperature corrosionFossil fuelChromiumChemical engineeringWaste managementThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concerns with greenhouse gas emissions and the uncertainty of long-term supply of fossil fuels have resulted in renewed interest in nuclear energy as an essential part of the energy mix for the future. Many countries worldwide including Canada, China, and EU are currently undertaking the design of generation IV supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) with higher thermodynamic efficiency and considerable plant simplification. The identification of appropriate materials for in-core and out-of-core components to contain the supercritical water (SCW) coolant is one of the major challenges for the design of SCWR. This study is carried out to evaluate the oxidation/corrosion behaviors of bare alloy 214 and NiCrAlY coated 214 under SCW at a temperature of 700 °C/25 MPa for 1000 h. The results show that chromium and nickel based oxide forms on the bare surface after exposure in SCW for 1000 h. A dense and adhered oxide layer, consisting of Cr2O3 with spinel (Ni(Cr, Al)2O4), was observed on NiCrAlY surface after 1000 h in SCW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation ScienceSame topicSubcritical and Supercritical Water ProcessesFrench-language works237,207