La brincadeira, genre métis: performance, dissensus et esthétique décoloniale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Ce texte propose une réflexion sur la brincadeira en tant que genre performanciel à partir d’une perspective articulant option décoloniale, aisthesis et politique de l’esthétique, pour contribuer directement au champ relativement nouveau decolonial aesthetics. Une ethnographie du maracatu-de-baque-solto de Pernambuco agence la réflexion théorique et analytique, mettant en lumière ses singularités comprises comme logiques du dissensus, produisant une multiplicité indissociablement conceptuelle et vitaliste à son image. Il s’intéresse ensuite spécifiquement aux modalités performatives de la brincadeira comme genre à la lumière de la modalité de l’action brincar qui l’inscrit comme aisthesis résolument indisciplinée. Finalement, il tente de comprendre comment, dans cette tension, la brincadeira, une production culturelle native, peut participer concrètement au projet decolonial aesthetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".