Core Work Values of Librarians & their Intent to Leave
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intention of this study was to determine if there is significant relationship between core work values of librarian and their intent to leave. Through non-experimental quantitative research design utilizing descriptive-correlational technique, mean, Pearson r, Regression analysis, and universal sampling technique with one hundred librarians as respondents. The researcher used the core work values questionnaire and intent to leave questionnaire. The study revealed a very high level of core work values of librarians in terms of work to serve the public, work towards common goals, work to the best of abilities, and valuing and respecting each other. The level of intent to leave of the librarians is moderate in terms of perceived alternative employment opportunities, job hopping, and turnover intention. No overall significant relationship was observed between the core work values of librarians and their intent to leave but there were significant relationships in some of their respective indicators. It was noted that among the indicators of core work values, work towards common goals best predicts intent to leave.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it