MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736781335 · doi:10.1080/02255189.2017.1336079

Agro-industrialisation and food security: dietary diversity and food access of workers in Cameroon’s palm oil sector

2017· article· en· W2736781335 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Steffi Hamann

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCentre for International Forestry Research
KeywordsFood securitySubsistence agricultureIndustrialisationPalm oilAgricultureBusinessCorporate governanceFood processingDietary diversityWageFood systemsAgricultural economicsFood sectorEconomic growthGeographyEconomicsAgricultural scienceLabour economicsPolitical scienceMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the impacts of industrialisation processes in the agricultural sector of sub-Saharan Africa. Drawing on findings from a household survey in Cameroon’s palm oil sector, it examines local food systems and compares the household food security situation of salaried workers in industrialised agricultural production sites with that of traditional smallholders. Results indicate divergent levels of dietary diversity and food access in plantation workers’ camps. Most wage earners continue to engage in subsistence farming as a coping mechanism. Governance implications to ensure food security for agro-industry employees are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développementSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207