MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736824509 · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.064

Accuracy of Cuff-Measured Blood Pressure

2017· review· en· W2736824509 on OpenAlexaff
Dean S. Picone, Martin G. Schultz, Petr Otáhal, Svend Aakhus, Ahmed M. Al‐Jumaily, J. Andrew Black, Willem Jan W. Bos, John B. Chambers, Chen-Huan Chen, Hao‐Min Cheng, Antoine Crémer, Justin E. Davies, Nathan Dwyer, B A Gould, Alun D. Hughes, Peter Lacy, Esben Laugesen, Fuyou Liang, Roman Melamed, Sandy Muecke, Nobuyuki Ohte, Sho Okada, Stefano Omboni, Christian Ott, Xiaoqing Peng, Telmo Pereira, Giacomo Pucci, Ronak Rajani, Philip Roberts‐Thomson, Niklas B. Rossen, Daisuke Sueta, Manish D. Sinha, Roland E. Schmieder, Harold Smulyan, Velandai Srikanth, Ralph Stewart, George A. Stouffer, Kenji Takazawa, Ji‐Guang Wang, Berend E. Westerhof, Franz Weber, Thomas Weber, Bryan Williams, Hirotsugu Yamada, Eiichiro Yamamoto, James E. Sharman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American College of Cardiology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineCuffBlood pressureCardiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations269
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American College of CardiologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207