MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736941109 · doi:10.1353/afa.2017.0028

Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada ed. by Liat Ben-Moshe, Chris Chapman, and Allison C. Carey

2017· article· en· W2736941109 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Spivakovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican American Review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImprisonmentDisability studiesPoliticsSociologyScholarshipCriminologyGender studiesLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada ed. by Liat Ben-Moshe, Chris Chapman, and Allison C. Carey Claire Spivakovsky Liat Ben-Moshe, Chris Chapman, and Allison C. Carey, eds. Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 307 pp. $32.00. Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and Disability in the United States and Canada is an edited collection that seeks to examine the intersection of disability with different sites of confinement. In particular, the collection seeks to examine how [End Page 244] disability and confinement are expressed in situation with other forms of stratification in society, such as gender and race. Inspired by Foucault's work on political rationalities, the book aims to contribute to "understandings of the shared and divergent political rationalities at work in making the confinement of diverse bodies seem acceptable and useful" (x). To do this, the book provides fourteen chapters which engage with the confinement of disability in society across two parts. In the first, the histories and legacies of confining disabled and different bodies are traced in their various forms. In the second, the contemporary landscape of interlocking oppressions is explored, and the connection between disability and modern-day incarceration are brought to the fore. The collection brings together the work of scholars and activists working within and across the broad fields of disability studies, critical race theory, gender studies, and punishment and society scholarship. While not entirely the intention of the editors, the collection ultimately offers three main contributions to scholarship. First, the collection extends our appreciation of the interlocking systems of oppression that see very specific populations confined more than others. Indeed the majority of chapters within the collection try in some way to illuminate the overlapping and intersecting incarceration histories of racialized, gendered, and disabled bodies. This includes, for example, Chapman's historical account of "ethical reformulations," Ware, Rozsa, and Dias's account of the co-constructions of racism, disability, and the Prison Industrial Complex, and several others. Together, these essays outline an intricate tapestry of intersections, overlaps, and mutual constitutions between race, gender, ability, and the prison. As such, the collection advances scholarship on intersectionality and incarceration, without resorting, as Chapman aptly puts it, to the simplistic task of claiming to "find the master trope of all oppression" (28). Second, the book further expands our understanding of the different sites of incarceration which have taken shape in society over time, and the connections between the development and use of such sites. The book does this by offering several cogent accounts of the wide range of ways that disability and its interlocking oppressions have been confined through various institutions and practices beyond the traditional prison. For example, Chapman, Carey, and Ben-Moshe provide a detailed historical overview of the different modes of confinement people with disabilities have experienced over time: from undifferentiated almshouses, to specialist systems for reform and integration (e.g., specialist schools, penitentiaries, and medical institutions). Erevelles offers a reflective and compelling account of the school-to-prison pipeline, drawing convincing parallels between "the dis-locating practices of public education, the postcolonial ghetto and the segregational statutes of the New Jim Crow" (91). And Fabris and Aubrecht provide an intriguing, letter-based narrative analysis of "chemical incarceration" in institutional settings, giving new meaning to the ways that coercively administered medications "restrain the body and create dependency, using the body against the person, which results in an indefinite form of detention" (186). Such work will appeal to activists and scholars working in the broad fields of disability studies, mad studies, and punishment and society scholarship, offering them an important platform from which to engage in further conversations about the connections between seemingly separate sites of confinement. The final contribution of this book lies in its capacity to illuminate the underlying stories of nationhood and citizenship that are woven into the history of disability's incarceration. For example, both Reaume and Mirza explore the location of disability in the geopolitics of transnational migration, with Reaume providing a rich, historic account of "how incarceration in psychiatric hospitals, in 1920s Toronto in particular, was an intermediate station in the process...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican American ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207