MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737032284 · doi:10.18178/ijmlc.2016.6.3.596

ABC-SVM: Artificial Bee Colony and SVM Method for Microarray Gene Selection and Multi Class Cancer Classification

2016· article· en· W2737032284 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsSupport vector machineComputer scienceGene selectionArtificial intelligenceSelection (genetic algorithm)Class (philosophy)Machine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Microarray analysis techniquesGeneGene expressionBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose apply ABC algorithm in analyzing microarray dataset. In addition, we propose an innovative hybrid classification model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) with ABC algorithm, to measure the classification accuracy for selected genes. We evaluate the performance of the proposed ABC-SVM algorithm by conducting extensive experiments on six binary and multi-class microarrays dataset. Furthermore, we compare our proposed ABC-SVM algorithm with previously known techniques. The experimental results prove that ABC-SVM algorithm is promising approach for solving gene selection and cancer classification problems, and achieves the highest classification accuracy together with the lowest average of selected genes compared to previously suggested methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it