MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737092415 · doi:10.7202/1040303ar

iReal Pro. Un outil technologique utilisé à des fins didactiques pour soutenir les recommandations de la recherche scientifique dans l’enseignement instrumental

2017· article· fr· W2737092415 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas Rieppi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue musicale OICRM · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose des façons concrètes d’intégrer à l’enseignement d’instruments de musique des recommandations issues de la recherche scientifique sur l’utilisation des technologies. En fait, il guide les praticiens sur l’utilisation du logiciel iReal Pro à l’aide d’exemples concrets modelés à partir de cours de percussions. Pour terminer, je reviens autour d’observations pédagogiques quant à l’intégration des technologies dans mes leçons de percussion et sur la manière dont leur utilisation a pu remédier, en partie, au décalage mis en avant dans la recherche scientifique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0170.018
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue musicale OICRMSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207