MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2737105126 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2017-0216

Anharmonic effect of the rate constant of the reactions of CH<sub>3</sub>SCH<sub>2</sub>OO system in high-temperature combustion

2017· article· en· W2737105126 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hao Yu, Xinxiang Pan, Liguo Song, Yang Ding, Wenwen Xia, Shiye Wang, Hongjing Yu, Liqiang Kang, Li Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesMajor Research PlanNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAnharmonicityChemistryReaction rate constantRRKM theoryCombustionTransition state theoryTransition stateThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryActivation energyComputational chemistryAtomic physicsKineticsQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study mainly focuses on the anharmonic effect of the reactions of CH3SCH2OO system. The geometries of the reactants and the transition states are optimized with Gaussian 09. The barrier heights are calculated with the energy of the reactants and the transition states. The RRKM theory is utilized to calculate the anharmonic and harmonic rate constants of the reactions. The anharmonic effect of these reactions can be clearly demonstrated by our results. Generally speaking, in the study, for most reactions, the rate constants increase with the temperature in the canonical case and the total energy in the microcanonical case, and the anharmonic effect of these reactions is significant and should not be neglected in high-temperature combustion. In CH3SCH2OO system, CH3SCH2OO → CH2SCH2OOH → CH2S + CH2O + OH is the main reaction channel. After a series of calculations, the anharmonic effect is remarkable, especially in high-temperature combustion. By analyzing other meaningful reactions that followed that channel above, the anharmonic effect of these reactions is generally obvious enough, especially for those reactions whose barrier heights are relatively low.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→