MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737299582 · doi:10.2214/ajr.16.17649

Utility of MRI to Differentiate Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Adrenal Metastases From Adrenal Adenomas

2017· article· en· W2737299582 on OpenAlexaff
Nicola Schieda, Satheesh Krishna, Matthew D. F. McInnes, Bardia Moosavi, Abdulmohsen Alrashed, Robert B. Moreland, Evan S. Siegelman

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Roentgenology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal cell carcinomaClear cell renal cell carcinomaAdrenal adenomaPathologyCarcinomaAdenomaOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare MRI features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) adrenal metastases and adenomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen clear cell RCC adrenal metastases imaged with MRI were compared to 29 consecutive adenomas between 2006 and 2015. Two blinded radiologists assessed homogeneity (homogeneous vs heterogeneous), signal intensity (SI) decrease on chemical-shift MRI, and T2-weighted SI (isointense, mildly hyperintense, or markedly hyperintense) relative to muscle. A third blinded radiologist measured the chemical-shift SI index, adrenal-to-spleen SI ratio, T2-weighted SI ratio, AUC for contrast-enhanced MRI, and histogram analysis. Analyses were performed using chi-square, linear regression, ROC, and logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Clear cell RCC metastases were larger than adenomas (mean [± SD], 5.0 ± 4.2 cm [range, 1.1-15 cm] vs 2.0 ± 0.7 cm [range, 1.2-3.7 cm]; p < 0.0001). Subjectively, 33.3% (5/15) of metastases and 68.9% (20/29) of adenomas showed an SI decrease on chemical-shift MRI (p = 0.0421; κ = 0.76). Chemical-shift SI index (mean, 9.2% ± 20.6%; range, -30.0% to 57.9%) and adrenal-to-spleen SI ratio (0.94 ± 0.23 [range, 0.44-1.33]) for metastases differed significantly from those for adenomas (47.3% ± 27.8% [range, -9.4% to 86%] and 0.52 ± 0.28 [range, 0.13-1.11], respectively) (p < 0.0001). Twenty percent (3/15) of metastases had chemical-shift SI index in the adenoma range (> 16.5%). Metastases had higher T2-weighted SI than did adenomas, both quantitatively (5.1 ± 3.0 [range, 1.5-10.6] vs 1.8 ± 0.8 [range, 0.5-3.8]; p < 0.0001) and subjectively (p < 0.0001; κ = 0.89). Metastases had higher entropy than did adenomas (6.76 ± 0.61 vs 6.1 ± 0.74; p = 0.0051) and were subjectively more heterogeneous (p < 0.0001; κ = 0.86). The contrast-enhanced MRI AUC, skewness, and kurtosis did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). The ROC AUCs were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-1.0) for T2-weighted SI ratio and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.0) for entropy. The logistic regression model of T2-weighted SI ratio plus entropy improved accuracy (ROC AUC, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.0]) compared with either feature alone (p = 0.0215). CONCLUSION: Increased T2-weighted SI and heterogeneity are features that can differentiate clear cell RCC adrenal metastases from adenomas using quantitative and subjective analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of RoentgenologySame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207