MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737299582 · doi:10.2214/ajr.16.17649

Utility of MRI to Differentiate Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Adrenal Metastases From Adrenal Adenomas

2017· article· en· W2737299582 on OpenAlex
Nicola Schieda, Satheesh Krishna, Matthew D. F. McInnes, Bardia Moosavi, Abdulmohsen Alrashed, Robert B. Moreland, Evan S. Siegelman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Roentgenology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRenal cell carcinomaClear cell renal cell carcinomaAdrenal adenomaPathologyCarcinomaAdenomaOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare MRI features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) adrenal metastases and adenomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen clear cell RCC adrenal metastases imaged with MRI were compared to 29 consecutive adenomas between 2006 and 2015. Two blinded radiologists assessed homogeneity (homogeneous vs heterogeneous), signal intensity (SI) decrease on chemical-shift MRI, and T2-weighted SI (isointense, mildly hyperintense, or markedly hyperintense) relative to muscle. A third blinded radiologist measured the chemical-shift SI index, adrenal-to-spleen SI ratio, T2-weighted SI ratio, AUC for contrast-enhanced MRI, and histogram analysis. Analyses were performed using chi-square, linear regression, ROC, and logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Clear cell RCC metastases were larger than adenomas (mean [± SD], 5.0 ± 4.2 cm [range, 1.1-15 cm] vs 2.0 ± 0.7 cm [range, 1.2-3.7 cm]; p < 0.0001). Subjectively, 33.3% (5/15) of metastases and 68.9% (20/29) of adenomas showed an SI decrease on chemical-shift MRI (p = 0.0421; κ = 0.76). Chemical-shift SI index (mean, 9.2% ± 20.6%; range, -30.0% to 57.9%) and adrenal-to-spleen SI ratio (0.94 ± 0.23 [range, 0.44-1.33]) for metastases differed significantly from those for adenomas (47.3% ± 27.8% [range, -9.4% to 86%] and 0.52 ± 0.28 [range, 0.13-1.11], respectively) (p < 0.0001). Twenty percent (3/15) of metastases had chemical-shift SI index in the adenoma range (> 16.5%). Metastases had higher T2-weighted SI than did adenomas, both quantitatively (5.1 ± 3.0 [range, 1.5-10.6] vs 1.8 ± 0.8 [range, 0.5-3.8]; p < 0.0001) and subjectively (p < 0.0001; κ = 0.89). Metastases had higher entropy than did adenomas (6.76 ± 0.61 vs 6.1 ± 0.74; p = 0.0051) and were subjectively more heterogeneous (p < 0.0001; κ = 0.86). The contrast-enhanced MRI AUC, skewness, and kurtosis did not differ between groups (p > 0.05). The ROC AUCs were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-1.0) for T2-weighted SI ratio and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.68-1.0) for entropy. The logistic regression model of T2-weighted SI ratio plus entropy improved accuracy (ROC AUC, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.0]) compared with either feature alone (p = 0.0215). CONCLUSION: Increased T2-weighted SI and heterogeneity are features that can differentiate clear cell RCC adrenal metastases from adenomas using quantitative and subjective analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it