L’apport de François Beaudin : la mise en place du rapport Deschênes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente les années charnières du Service des archives de l’Université de Montréal, débutant lorsque François Beaudin arrive à la direction du service en avril 1972. Il hérite alors d’une situation décriée par son prédécesseur, Luc-André Biron, dans un mémoire déposé à la Commission conjointe du Conseil de l’Université et de l’Assemblée universitaire. Le rapport de la Commission, préparé par le juge Deschênes, en accepte les principales recommandations donnant un nouveau souffle au Service. S’appuyant sur ces recommandations, François Beaudin transformera le Service des archives en profondeur durant son court mandat de quatre ans : création de la Commission des archives, embauche de personnel qualifié qui feront leur marque sur la scène archivistique, approbation des premières règles de conservation, mise en place de dépôt de documents semi-actifs, etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".