MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737336407 · doi:10.5376/ijh.2017.07.0016

Differential Role of 6-Benzylaminopurine in Potato Tissue Culture

2017· article· en· W2737336407 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Siddra Ijaz, Imran Ul Haq

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Horticulture · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential (mechanical device)Tissue cultureBiologyGeneticsIn vitroEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phytohormones are the derivatives of secondary metabolic pathways. They are of diverse physiological role, molecular action and metabolism but they do cross talk during hormonal signaling pathways. During in vitro micropropagation and regeneration studies in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), so called berries like structures were observed. In these studies the effect of gibberellic acid (GA3), NAA (auxin) and BAP (cytokinins) were being investigating on in vitro micropropagation and in vitro regeneration of Solanum tuberosum L. (potato). In in vitro micropropagation study when potato tubers of cv. PRI-Red were treated with 0.3% GA3to induce sprouting and these sprouts were when cultured on micropropagation media containing 1.75, 2.75 mg/l BAP, then so called berries like structures were formed. Similarly, in in vitro regeneration study, when calli of potato cv. kuroda, induced on callus induction medium containing 4.5 mg/l 2-4D were when shifted on regeneration medium containing 4.75 mg/l BAP then same so-called berries like structures were formed. Hence histoanatomy of these berries like structure and microtubers were done which revealed that these are anatomically entirely different from microtubers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of HorticultureSame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207